Controlling Parasite: Active in One Goat Species, Passive in Another

Image

The mastic tree (Pistacia lentiscus) contains 20% tannins. The tree makes up 17% of the diet of Damascus goats, but only 6% of the diet of Mamber goats. Like many natural chemicals, tannins can be a toxin or a medicine depending on the dose. Mastic tannins can interfere with an animal’s nitrogen balance but also can act as a de-wormer.

Researchers in Israel examined how readily young goats infected with gastro-intestinal parasites ate mastic foliage. Goats with internal parasites typically have a decrease in plasma cell volume value and a decline in growth rate. Mamber and Damascus goats were infected with internal parasites and then fed either hay or hay and mastic foliage.

Fecal egg counts declined sharply in goats that ate mastic foliage compared to the hay diet, but it also impaired the protein balance of the goats, determined by a decrease in blood urea levels.

When given a choice between hay and mastic, infected mamber goats ate 14% more mastic than non-infected Mamber goats. Damascus goats ate the same amount of mastic whether or not they were infected with parasite. Infected goats fed hay, regardless of breed, increased intake of mastic when given a choice between the two feeds.

Goats can passively self-medicate provided they routinely eat high and constant amounts of masticate (tannins). Goats less likely to eat mastic, such as Mamber goats, eat more of the plant only when parasite load increased. Active self-medication can be explained by the neophilic (preferring novel foods) behavior of sick animals. Self-medication of parasite-afflicted goats is a complex process, involving previous foraging habits affected by breed and experience.

Learning and Memory in Caterpillars?

 

For those of you unfamiliar with the term instar. I know I had to look it up.

Most of us don’t really care about the learning and memory of insects, but if caterpillars can learn and remember it’s hard to argue livestock can’t. This study examines whether experiences at the larval stages in the tobacco hornworm can persist through pupation into adulthood.

Fifth instar tobacco hornworm caterpillars received an electrical shock paired with the odor of ethyl acetate to create a conditioned odor aversion. Researchers showed that larvae learned to avoid the odor, and that this aversion was still present in adults. The adult aversion came from training and did not result from carryover of chemicals from the larval environment because neither applying odorants to naive pupae nor washing the pupae of trained caterpillars changed their behavior.

Larvae trained in the third instar still showed odor aversion after two molts, as fifth instars, but did not avoid the odor as adults. Apparently, post-metamorphic recall involves regions of the brain that are not developed until later in the caterpillar’s life.

Reference: Blackiston, DJ, ES Casey, and MR Weiss. 2008. Retention of Memory through Metamorphosis: Can a Moth Remember What It Learned as a Caterpillar? PLoS ONE 3(3): e1736. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0001736

 

Grazing with Zebra: Do They Compete with Cattle?

Ranchers in African generally prefer to keep wild grazers like zebras off the grass meant for their cattle. Worldwide savanna rangelands are managed on the premise that cattle and wildlife compete for food. It makes sense, but surprisingly there is little scientific information to support the assumption.

Researchers in Kenya grazed cattle in fenced 10-acre plots of savanna rangeland. Fences excluded wildlife principally zebras. Other groups of cattle grazed with wildlife. Cattle were weighed periodically throughout the year. During the dry season, grazing with wildlife reduced weight gain by cattle, but in the wet season, cattle actually gain more weight when they grazed with wildlife.

During the wet season, grass grows tall and quickly loses its nutritional value. Under these conditions having zebras is beneficial. Zebras are more willing than cattle to knock back the rank grass leaving higher-quality grass for cattle.

It’s not yet clear whether there is a net benefit over a whole year or series of years because conditions vary from year to year. From a management perspective, the positive effect of wildlife on weight gain by cattle during the wet season suggests that wildlife conservation is not necessarily detrimental to, and can at times be compatible with, cattle production.

Reference: Odadi, W.O., M.K. Karachi, S.A. Abdulrazak, and T.P. Young. 2011. African Wild Ungulates Compete with or Facilitate Cattle Depending on Season. Science 333:1753-1755.

It’s the flavor. It’s always the flavor.

Many of the studies on food aversion have used concentrates or food flavors. A few have used shrubs. I’ve often been asked if animals would generalize an aversion to all grasses if they were averted to one grass. My answer has always been: “No not all grasses.” Generalizing the aversion to other grass species would depend on how similar the flavors are between grasses and the strength of the aversion.

A study by Ginane and Dumont answer the question at least between perennial ryegrass and tall fescue. Researchers used a fairly low dose of LiCl (70 mg/kg body weight) to condition an aversion with sheep to ryegrass that was tall in stature. They also looked if animals would avoid a plant based on height. After conditioning, sheep avoided short ryegrass, but readily ate tall fescue that was tall in stature. Sheep did not avoid grass based on height.

Researchers also conditioned sheep to avoid timothy hay but sheep continued to eat red fescue hay after conditioning.

Sheep may use physical characteristics to search out certain foods. But when it comes to eating a food, it’s flavor that matters, not height, not color, or other physical characteristics of the food.

Reference: Ginane, C., and B. Dumont. 2006. Generalization of conditioned food aversions in grazing sheep and its implications for food categorization. Behavioural Processes 73:178–186. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2006.05.006

High Fiber in Mom’s Diet Benefits Calves

Calves fed ammoniated wheat straw (AWS) with their mothers during the first 3 months of life perform better on AWS as adults. Does AWS in the diet of pregnant cows affect the intake and digestibility of AWS by their calves?Cows were fed a either a high-fiber diet (HF) of ammoniated wheat straw (AWS) and wheat middlings (WM) or a low-fiber diet (LF) of grass hay and barley. Both diets contained the same amount of net energy, nitrogen, minerals and vitamins, but they varied 10-fold in the solubility of carbohydrates in the diet.

Cows were fed either HF or LF during the last 5 months of pregnancy. At calving, all cow-calf pairs were fed high quality alfalfa-grass hay for 45 d then moved to pasture for 5 months. Calves were weaned at seven months and fed good quality alfalfa hay 3weeks.

For 40 days, all calves were fed WM supplement and AWS ad libitum. Calves from cows fed HF during pregnancy ate more AWS, and it was more digestible compared to calves from cows fed LF diets. There was also a tendency for calves fed AWS + WM to gain more weight if their mothers had eaten HF rather then LF.

Higher digestible intake of poor quality forage is likely important for pregnant cows that winter on rangelands. Cows eating high-fiber diets during pregnancy and after calving likely produce replacement heifers that will be more productive on poor-quality forages during winter.

Ref: Wiedmeier, RD, JJ Villalba, A Summers and FD Provenza. 2012. Eating a high fiber diet during pregnancy increases intake and digestibility of a high fiber diet by offspring in cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 177:144-151.